<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airshow Pilot for a Day!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/</link>
	<description>&#34;Come fly with me, let&#039;s take off in the blue...&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/comment-page-1/#comment-6456</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/airshow_pilot_for_a_day/#comment-6456</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t around for the 25Z incident, but when doing the Cirrus transition ground, James mentioned something about it having had a prop strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t around for the 25Z incident, but when doing the Cirrus transition ground, James mentioned something about it having had a prop strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/comment-page-1/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/airshow_pilot_for_a_day/#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>Ron-
  You are absolutely correct.  There isn&#039;t much damage to a plane from a reg gear up landing and if its done right, there is no injury as well.  I guess we could say instead of routine, non emergency.  

But yes, the media will MAKE it into an emergency.  Of course, maybe they are still thinking about the Gear up./hydro failure of that DC - 10 des moins.  

Now that thing BURST into flames and of course made for Good media.  I supopse you could say there IS a potential for good media.

But lets talk about 325Z for a while.  In October, when it made a nose wheel-less landing, there was NO damage and it is already back on line!  So yeah, can be done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron-<br />
  You are absolutely correct.  There isn&#8217;t much damage to a plane from a reg gear up landing and if its done right, there is no injury as well.  I guess we could say instead of routine, non emergency.  </p>
<p>But yes, the media will MAKE it into an emergency.  Of course, maybe they are still thinking about the Gear up./hydro failure of that DC &#8211; 10 des moins.  </p>
<p>Now that thing BURST into flames and of course made for Good media.  I supopse you could say there IS a potential for good media.</p>
<p>But lets talk about 325Z for a while.  In October, when it made a nose wheel-less landing, there was NO damage and it is already back on line!  So yeah, can be done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/comment-page-1/#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/airshow_pilot_for_a_day/#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>Routine in the sense that it&#039;s not a big deal.I&#039;ve never heard of anyone getting hurt in a gear up landing, inadvertent or intentional.  It scratches the bottom of the fuselage and curls the prop tips.  That&#039;s about it.

But to watch it on the news, you&#039;d think it was the end of the world and that the airplane was sure to burst into flames, wiping out the entire airport in the ensuing explosion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Routine in the sense that it&#8217;s not a big deal.I&#8217;ve never heard of anyone getting hurt in a gear up landing, inadvertent or intentional.  It scratches the bottom of the fuselage and curls the prop tips.  That&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>But to watch it on the news, you&#8217;d think it was the end of the world and that the airplane was sure to burst into flames, wiping out the entire airport in the ensuing explosion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/goulian/comment-page-1/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/03/airshow_pilot_for_a_day/#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>Gear up Landing...Routine????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gear up Landing&#8230;Routine????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

